You Are browsing ‘Journal’ Category


Recovery and Analysis of Jamestown Rediscovery South Churchyard Burials from the 1999

Sunday, October 25th, 2009

Recovery and Analysis of Jamestown Rediscovery

South Churchyard Burials from the 1999

Field Season

Douglas Owsley, Karin Bruwelheide, and Rebecca Kardash

National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution

Abstract

Osteological analysis of two South Churchyard burials excavated during

Jamestown Rediscovery’s 1999 field season offered insight into the age, sex, ancestry,

and pathology of these individuals. Burial 4 (JR316F) contained the remains of a

male Euro-American, aged 50-59 years old at the time of his death. The skeletal

remains of a 40-49 year old Euro-American female were uncovered in Burial 5

(JR320F). The skeletons also provided potential evidence for daily activities such

as horseback riding, strenuous labor, and tobacco-pipe smoking.

1. Introduction

Two burials were excavated during the 1999 field season of the APVA’s

Jamestown Rediscovery project (Burials 4 and 5). They were located within seven

feet of one another, in parallel alignment, and 69° west of north. Douglas Owsley

and Rebecca Kardash examined the burials in situ on September 9, 1999. Chip

Clark documented the burials with 35 mm color slides. Following complete excavation,

each set of remains was then inventoried and examined to determine the

number of elements present, age, sex, ancestry and evidence of skeletal and dental

pathology. Douglas Owsley, Karin Bruwelheide and Rebecca Kardash conducted

the osteological analysis on June 5 and 6, 2000. (more…)

The Journal of the Jamestown Rediscovery Center –Brief and True Report of Projectile Points from Jamestown Rediscovery as of December 1998

Sunday, October 25th, 2009

Abstract

Examination of a sample of hafted bifaces from the Jamestown Rediscovery assemblage

revealed the function and origin of the stone tools and further detailed

site chronology. It also identified a correspondence between the different material

types of the hafted bifaces and their breakage frequencies. Most of the locally

made quartzite triangular hafted bifaces were broken whereas very few of those

made of non-local jasper and dark chert exhibited significant breakage. These

findings might indicate differential use and offer insight into intercultural exchange

or hostilities at the site of the original James Fort. (more…)

More Than “A Few Blew Beads”: The Glass and Stone Beads from Jamestown Rediscovery’s 1994-1997 Excavations

Saturday, October 24th, 2009

More Than “A Few Blew Beads”: The Glass

and Stone Beads from Jamestown Rediscovery’s

1994-1997 Excavations

Heather A. Lapham

University of Virginia

Abstract

Investigation of the glass and stone beads uncovered during Jamestown

Rediscovery’s 1994-1997 field seasons identified 28 different varieties and established

a material line of evidence on which to base subsequent studies regarding

intercultural relations, exchange networks, and global commerce. Historically

verified blue beads dominated the assemblage, including dozens of robin’s-egg

blue, nueva cadiz-like turquoise, and nueva cadiz-like navy blue examples. The

overall assemblage resembled collections from 16th-century Spanish colonial sites

more than those from 17th-century English settlements in America. The distinctiveness

of Jamestown’s beads might suggest changes in bead production practices

and reveal a transformation in European trade kits.

1. Introduction

In January of 1608, English Captains Christopher Newport and John Smith

led a team of colonists on a trading venture to Chief Powhatan’s home village at

Werowocomoco. Once the Powhatan leader had informed the colonists of the

price he wanted for his corn, the two English captains began to argue amongst

themselves about fair exchange values. Tension mounted between Newport and

Smith but was eased when they saw Chief Powhatan’s reaction to a handful of European

beads. Powhatan, who had declined to participate in any trade up to this

point, “fixed his humour upon a few blew beads” and “importunatly desired

them” (Barbour 1986 I:217). Smith then increased the Algonquian leader’s eagerness

to exchange by embellishing the beads’ significance. He informed Powhatan

that the blue beads being offered were “composed of a most rare substance of the

colour of the skyes, and not to be worne but by the greatest kings in the world”

(Ibid., II:156). So fascinated with these items was the Algonquian chief that “for a

pound or two of blew beads” he offered “2 or 300 bushels of corne” (ibid.). Although

Jamestown’s early European settlers considered glass beads to be trifles, the

Powhatans held them in high esteem. For the local indigenous population, glass

beads were highly symbolic and ritually charged objects whose ownership was

linked to elite status (Potter 1989, 1993; Rountree 1989).

(more…)

The Journal of the Jamestown Rediscovery Center (Foreword))

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009
Foreword
Spanish philosopher Jose Ortega y Gasset once asserted that, “The choice of a point of view is the initial act of culture” (1961:7). I believe that it is also the inaugural step in studying a culture. The Journal of the Jamestown Rediscovery Center (JJRC) is created in the hopes of creating additional perspectives on the ongoing excavations at the site of the first permanent English settlement in America. The journal provides a venue in which specialists who have worked as consultants on the Jamestown Rediscovery project will disseminate the results of their research. External analyses of the archaeology of James Fort further Jamestown Rediscovery’s quest for insight into daily life at Jamestown Island in the time of European expansion by strengthening the project’s ability to see significant patterns in relevant data and to determine meaningful relationships. Adopting French painter Paul Cezanne’s appreciation for the position of the observer–or in this case, the scholar–the JJRC endeavors to establish an open forum to “treat the archaeology of Jamestown in terms of the cultural, the historical, the natural, all in perspective” (1978:13).
The articles in the JJRC are detailed and rigorous, sacrificing style for substance when necessary. Though the subject matter at times requires the use of technical language, the journal’s studies are as explanatory and straightforward as the topics warrant. The three articles in Volume 1 detail individual analyses undertaken on materials uncovered by Jamestown Rediscovery excavations at the Fort site. The selective focus of each study produces high-resolution observations that serve as springboards for subsequent interpretive debates.
The examination by Blanton, Deitrick, and Bartels’ of hafted bifaces identifies a correlation in the Jamestown Rediscovery assemblage between raw material type and failure frequencies. Locally made projectile points were usually broken whereas those of non-local origin exhibited little damage. The pattern intimates differential use, prompting consideration of intercultural exchange practices and the distinctiveness of tribal identity within the Powhatan chiefdom. How and why did the colonists acquire the unbroken foreign points? Could they be gifts from distant indigenous allies of the English?
Lapham’s analysis of the Jamestown Rediscovery bead assemblage produces both expected and unexpected results. That over half of the 337 beads are blue–robin’s egg, turquoise, or navy–is no surprise. The historical records repeatedly mentioned the popularity of blue beads among the indigenous populations. Lapham’s regional bead comparisons, however, suggest that Jamestown’s early Fort-Period beads have more in common with 16th-century Spanish finds than with those from 17th-century English sites. The formal and temporal uniqueness of Jamestown Rediscovery’s bead assemblage leads to questions regarding global commerce and production practices in Venice.
The article by Owsley, Bruwelheide, and Kardash details an osteological study of two late 18th-century human skeletons uncovered in the South Churchyard area of the Fort site. The discussion employs a standardized method of burial analysis and provides insight into the lives of the exhumed individuals. The pathological evidence indicates certain daily life activities of those at post-1750 Jamestown, including horseback riding, physical labor, and pipe smoking. The authors also list the skeletal factors that form the basis of each of their conclusions.
Volume 1 is the first in a series of annual collections showcasing additional insights and perspectives of the Jamestown Rediscovery project. I wish to express my gratitude to the authors of the three articles presented here, to the JJRC’s Editorial Advisory Board and Associate Editor, and to my colleagues at Jamestown Rediscovery–former and current–for their scholarship, commitment, and support. With an eye to future Journals of the Jamestown Rediscovery Center and an archaeological eye always fixed on the past, I conclude with poet Henry Austin Dobson’s Paradox of Time (1913:18):
Time goes by you say? Ah no!
Alas, Time stays, we go.
Seth Mallios
Founding Editor
Notes
Bernard, Emile
1978 Conversations with Cezanne. Collection Macula, Paris.
Dobson, Henry Austin
1913 Collected Poems. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trhubner & Co., London.
Ortega y Gasset, Jose
1961 Meditations on Quixote. Norton, New York.

Foreword

Spanish philosopher Jose Ortega y Gasset once asserted that, “The choice of a point of view is the initial act of culture” (1961:7). I believe that it is also the inaugural step in studying a culture. The Journal of the Jamestown Rediscovery Center (JJRC) is created in the hopes of creating additional perspectives on the ongoing excavations at the site of the first permanent English settlement in America. The journal provides a venue in which specialists who have worked as consultants on the Jamestown Rediscovery project will disseminate the results of their research. External analyses of the archaeology of James Fort further Jamestown Rediscovery’s quest for insight into daily life at Jamestown Island in the time of European expansion by strengthening the project’s ability to see significant patterns in relevant data and to determine meaningful relationships. Adopting French painter Paul Cezanne’s appreciation for the position of the observer–or in this case, the scholar–the JJRC endeavors to establish an open forum to “treat the archaeology of Jamestown in terms of the cultural, the historical, the natural, all in perspective” (1978:13). (more…)

The Journal of the Jamestown Rediscovery Center

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009

Volume 1
January 2001
ISSN: 1534-6234

  1. Foreword
    Seth Mallios
    Jamestown Rediscovery
  2. Brief and True Report of Projectile Points from Jamestown Rediscovery as of December 1998
    Dennis B. Blanton, Veronica Deitrick, and Kara Bartels
    William & Mary Center for Archaeological Research
  3. More Than “A Few Blew Beads”: The Glass and Stone Beads from Jamestown Rediscovery’s 1994-1997 Excavations
    Heather A. Lapham
    University of Virginia
  4. Recovery and Analysis of Jamestown Rediscovery South Churchyard Burials from the 1999 Field Season
    Douglas Owsley, Karin Bruwelheide, and Rebecca Kardash
    National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution


Main Menu


September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Related Video

SORRY! No Video Found for Category 'Journal,'.